← All work

Case study · Toosalem Industrial · Internal product

Software for a factory floor

Packaging and maintenance were tracked by hand, and the numbers that reached management were hard to trust. I built and deployed two internal systems that replaced manual tracking for 21 people and made KPI reporting more accurate.

Role
Production Manager, and builder of the tools
Users
21 people
Systems
Packaging and maintenance management
Result
Manual tracking replaced
BEFORE manual tracking AFTER two internal systems PACKAGING MAINTENANCE KPI 21 users 2 systems illustrative
From manual tracking to two internal systems that feed KPI reports. Illustrative.

The situation

On the factory floor, packaging and maintenance were tracked manually. The KPIs built on that data were only as good as the records behind them.

The problem

Management made decisions on numbers that were late or incomplete. Maintenance was mostly reactive, because there was no reliable history of what had been done and when.

What I did

  • Started from the daily routine of the people who would use the tools: operators, supervisors and maintenance staff.
  • Built two focused systems: packaging management and maintenance management.
  • Deployed and supported them in production for 21 users, and retired manual tracking.
  • Connected the data to KPI reporting and to the preventive maintenance program.
“Find where the work is painful, build the smallest thing that fixes it, and make sure people actually use it.”

Results

2internal systems in production
21people using them
AccurateKPI reporting instead of manual tallies

What I learned

This was product work before I had the title: start from the people who do the job, solve the painful part first, and check that the tool is actually used.